🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to approve a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring parental consent for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.